is it too much of a pun to say seesmic rocks?

I’d like to think so, but seesmic is pretty cool. It’s a kind of video microblogging if you’re not familiar with it. It’s awesome that you can just press a button and record video right on the screen and upload it to a threaded video conversation. Now yes you can post a video response in a similar way on YouTube, but there are considerable differences between the two that largely emerge from the interface and presentation of media.

On YouTube you generally have many more text comments than video comments. I haven’t done a formal study; that’s just my observation. Text and video comments are essentially separate threads. In addition video comments on YouTube can be just a load of spam or disconnected matter.

So why am I blogging about it rather than going to seesmic? I guess in part b/c I think folks on seesmic probably get tired of meta conversations. However, one of the things that’s interesting to me about the video microblogging is how the interface and the camera situate the composition. Seesmic entries are largely impromptu. That might change, but right now it seems like the ethos is to just get on and express (or at least perform that way, right?). For the most part though, I think that is the compositional approach or at least the approach that users get to once they reach a certain level of comfort with the site.

A big part of that though is becoming accustomed to the otherwise uncanny experience of seeing yourself on the screen as you are recording. You have any number of choices to make–close ups, mid-shots, lighting. Some people use sock puppets on occasion. There’s the issue of eye contact, gestures, etc. The aesthetic in part seems to be experimenting with one’s visual capture until reaching an affective state where the uncanniness disappears and the video microblog flows with the ease of a twitter or a blog post or something in between. Indeed there is a sense or promise of using seesmic to meet exigencies as low as those of twitters.

We’ll see.

#plaa{display:none;visibility:hidden;}

2 thoughts on “is it too much of a pun to say seesmic rocks?

Add yours

  1. Hey there, like you I suspect Seesmic may rock. And whether or not it rocks, the conversations there have a feel all their own, no?
    Youtube threads are mostly text, yes, and what few video replies there are lack the un-composed, spontaneous feeling of Seesmic threads.
    I wonder — are these people all actors?
    I just bumped across it by accident a couple days ago, after reading about, and installing, the Seesmic WP plugin, so I’m feeling interloper-ish there, and also lacking the time to go purchase a web camera.
    How did you come across it?
    Ro

    Like

  2. Hi Ro, that’s a cool semi-paranoid question–are these people all actors? No, but I think there’s probably a certain personality type that gets attracted to leaping into something like this. Then there are also all the seesmic company folks who have existing social relations on which to build.
    Anyway I came across it from a Howard Rheingold twitter then read about it in TechCrunch.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: