speaking truth to Twitter

To be clear, Twitter has many possible uses, its primary one probably being making money, but, of course, its users, including me, put it to work in a variety of ways. It seems in the last year or two many academics have discovered Twitter (in much the same way that Columbus discovered America). And among... Continue Reading →

the failure to understand digital rhetoric

A brief round up of a few articles circulating my social media gaze: John McWhorter, Daily Beast, "Why Kim Kardashian Can't Write Good" Can A Private Limited Company Take Unsecured Loan Johnathon Jones, Guardian, "Emoji is dragging us back to the dark ages – and all we can do is smile" Eric Weiner, NPR, "In A Digital Chapter, Paper... Continue Reading →

arduino heuretics

As those of you who are involved in the maker end of the digital humanities or digital rhetoric know, Arduino combines a relatively simple microcontroller, open source software, and other electronics to create a platform for developing a range of devices. I seem to recall encountering Arduino-based projects at CCCC several years ago. In other words,... Continue Reading →

the humanities' dead letter office

Adeline Koh writes "a letter to the humanities" reminding them that DH will not save the humanities (a subject I've touched on at least once). Of course I agree, as I agree with her assertion that we "not limit the history of the digital humanities to humanities computing as a single origin point." Even the... Continue Reading →

"this will revolutionize education"

I picked up on this from Nick Carbone here. It's a video by physics educator Derek Muller (who I think I've written about before here but I can't seem to find it if I did).  Here's actually two videos. The share a common there. The first deals with the long history of claims that various... Continue Reading →

the "adjacent possible," capacities, and How We Got to Now

I read Stephen Johnson's How We Got to Now this weekend, a book that examines six technological trajectories: glass, cooling, sound recording, clean water, clocks, and lighting. These histories cut across disciplinary and social areas following what Johnson calls the "hummingbird effect" (after the co-evolution of hummingbirds and flowers). These are not technological determinist arguments but... Continue Reading →

teaching research, deep attention, and reading

I've been working recently through some concepts on attention and reading: Katherine Hayles on deep attention and hyper-reading, Richard Miller on slow reading, surface reading, Moretti's distant reading, and so on. It's part of my larger project taking a "realist rhetorical" approach to media ecologies and, in particular, that part of the ecology that I... Continue Reading →

WordPress.com.

Up ↑